Writing develops through feedback that is thorough, that knows what you wrote last time, that moves as you move, and that hands you something to practise with. Very few students get all four at once. We think they should.
Most writing feedback arrives too late to be used. A teacher carrying a full marking load cannot give every essay forty minutes of close attention, so what comes back is a grade, a few notes in the margin, and a comment general enough to fit almost any paper. By the time it lands, the student has started the next task, and the moment when the advice would have changed something has gone.
The feedback that does arrive usually has no memory. A new marker, a new term, a general purpose chatbot that forgets you the moment the tab closes: each one starts again from nothing. Nobody tells a student that this is the third essay running where the evidence is doing less work than the claim, because nobody has read the other two.
And feedback on its own is only half the job. Knowing that your paragraphs lose their thread is not the same as knowing how to hold one. Without something to practise against, a student is left to work out the remedy alone, which is precisely the part that needs teaching.
We believe writing develops through feedback that is thorough, that understands where a student has come from, that grows with them as they improve, and that comes with the materials to act on it. At the moment that combination mostly belongs to students whose families can afford a tutor every week. We would rather it were not the deciding factor.
We made WriteTut for the students we mark for, and that decides what we optimise for. Not the cleverest available response, but the one a student can act on before the next deadline.
That shows in the details. Feedback points at your own lines instead of offering advice that would fit anyone. Scores are banded and auditable, so you can see how a judgment was reached rather than being asked to trust it. When you have your school's rubric, we mark against that, because those are the criteria you will actually be graded on. And when the same weakness keeps returning, we turn it into something you can practise, not just something you have been told about again.
"Vary your sentence openings" is advice. It is true of almost everyone and useful to almost no one. "These four sentences all open with a subordinate clause" is feedback. We point at something you actually wrote, which is also what makes it possible to argue with us.
Every submission is read against the ones before it, so patterns surface that no single essay could show. When a weakness keeps returning we turn it into practice material, because naming a problem for the fourth time is not teaching.
A qualified teacher reviews the analysis before it reaches you, adjusting scores, sharpening wording, and cutting anything off base. Most submissions go through that review, though at busy periods some are released automatically. We would rather say so plainly than advertise a hundred per cent we cannot guarantee.
A hundred free tokens, no card, no subscription and no reset date. Send us something you have already handed in, and see whether the reading tells you anything you did not know.
Start free with 100 tokens